Breakthroughs in TNBC: Expert insights on neoadjuvant vs adjuvant therapy

By Lisa Marie Basile | Fact-checked by MDLinx staff
Published March 9, 2025

Key Takeaways

Conference Buzz

  • "We have made a lot of progress… with many agents showing improved survival. It’s very exciting, but there’s a lot of work to be done.” — Hyo Han, MD, Research Director, Department of Breast Oncology at Moffitt Cancer Center

Find more of your peers' perspectives and insights below.

In an early morning session on the last day of the Miami Breast Cancer Conference, Hyo Han, MD, Research Director, Department of Breast Oncology at Moffitt Cancer Center, discussed the best practices for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). 

TNBC occurs most often in Black patients, women under 40, or patients with a BRCA1 mutation. “These tumors are heterogeneous and aggressive,” Dr. Han says. “They have a higher rate of distance recurrence within 2 to 3 years of diagnosis.” “We have made a lot of progress…with many agents showing improved survival. It’s very exciting. But there’s a lot of work to be done,” Dr. Han says.

What makes a patient a good candidate for neoadjuvant therapy?

Dr. Han noted patients who are inoperable or those who have locally advanced disease—such as inflammatory breast cancer or bulky and/or matted cN2 or cN3, or cT4—are potential candidates for neoadjuvant therapy. Other candidates include those with TNBC and HER2+ with > cT2 or cN1, those with “a large primary tumor relative to breast size who [also] desire breast conservation, or those who have delayed definite surgery.

Related: Novel therapies for treating HR+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer: PROTAC and beyond

There are some pros and cons to neoadjuvant therapy, Dr. Han said. Among them, it can downstage the tumor and improve outcomes in breast-conserving surgery. There’s also an opportunity to optimize local therapy in patients with N+ to N0. It allows time for genetic testing and to plan reconstruction or lymphovenous bypass. However, the risks are “possible overtreatment if clinical stage is underestimated, and possible undertreatment locoregionally with radiation if clinical stage is underestimated,” according to Dr. Han.

She highlighted pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy, which was approved in 2022 as a neoadjuvant treatment and as a single agent for adjuvant therapy following surgery for patients with high-risk, early stage TNBC; approval was based on the KEYNOTE-522 findings. “I would like to point out that ‘high-risk’ wasn’t defined here, so it’s something to think about,” Dr. Han said.

For neoadjuvant therapy, “It’s important to get diagnostic staging correct,” Dr. Han says.

In early stage TNBC II-III, Dr. Han said the addition of a neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) (eg, pembrolizumab) to chemotherapy will increase pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival, and overall survival. There has been a benefit as across all subgroups, but studies have not established specific biomarkers for routine clinical use. “The optical timing and duration of IO is to be further determined,” Dr. Han said. 

Adjuvant therapy candidates, explained

“Adjuvant therapy is for some patients who declined neoadjuvant [or] patients with worse disease,” Dr. Han said. She pointed to a phase III study published in JAMA Oncology, which found that a paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen is an effective alternative adjuvant chemotherapy choice for patients with operable TNBC. “Carboplatin is shown to improve human survival,” Dr. Han said.

She also highlighted the CREATE-X clinical trial findings, which showed that after neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease-free survival and overall survival. This was in patients with HER2– breast cancer who had residual invasive disease.

“Current data supports the use of post--neoadjuvant therapy for high risk TNBC patients without pCR following neoadjuvant therapy,” Dr. Han said, including capecitabine and olaparib. She also recommended continued pembrolizumab in an adjuvant setting. “Combination therapy with pembrolizumab and capecitabine or olaparib can be considered for high-risk patients (non-pCR) despite lack of randomized trials,” said Dr. Han. The take home message, she impressed, is that this kind of treatment protocol requires a “multidisciplinary approach with shared decision making.” 

A quick guide for physicians, per Dr. Han

  • Stage T1a TNBC: NO adjuvant therapy

  • Stage T1b: Consider adjuvant chemotherapy

  • Stage T1C: Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  • Stage II-III TNBC: Neoadjuvant with Keynote-522 regimen

  • Post-neoadjuvant therapy for non-pCR: The capecitabine and olaparib clinical trial  

Read Next: From early stage to advanced BC: The latest buzz on HER2, HER3, and TROP2
Share with emailShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT